Cancer Cure - December 11th, 2009 - 15 Comments
Is the search for the cure for cancer more profitable than finding the cure?
If you consider all the fund-raising and research development in search of cures, as well as the profits from current treatment regimes condoned by the FDA and cancer-experts, is it in the medical industry’s best interests to keep searching for the cure rather than actually find a cure for cancer?
And do you personally trust the pharmaceutical companies to provide the most effective form of treatment? Couldn’t they obtain more profits by marketing two less-effective treatments than one effective treatment?
Cancer is a multi-billion dollar cash cow for BIxG PHxARMA so as long as B.P. gets to continue to control the published "research" and corrupt the FxDA, the cure will never be made known to the public.
Do not trust the pharmaceutical companies as far as you can spit them. They are Satan’s greatest agents on this earth.
Yes, perhaps.
No.
Actually, there are tens of millions of us in medicine who are immortal and keeping the secret of the cures for all diseases. But we’ll never tell.
Now take your medication for the paranoia, like a good boy, and leave us alone.
Yes the sad truth (in my opinion) is that the companies might already have the cure but why give it out when you can make a great supply of money every year forever if you wanted.
Or why not find the cure and then make it to were you have to take medicine doses for the rest of your life.
I am definitely not a conspiracy theorist, however I still have to look at facts.
And I have lost one friend to cancer and am about to lose another soon.
unfortunately it is true the big profits in medicine keep it rolling along so I guess we have to let it be. Do you have cancer worries now if so let me know
i do believe there is a cure for cancer. I’ve read alot of the book "Natural Cures They Dont Want You To Know About". He may be wrong on some things and go overboard, but he sure makes you think!
Also, check out a GREAT website, http://www.earthclinic.com
Hydrogen peroxide and apple cider vinegar are 2 great cure-alls! peroxide is mostly used to elevate oxygen levels overtime. cancer cells CANNOT live in an oxygen rich environment.
I am sure that the individuals involved in the medical, pharmaceutical, research, and fund-raising fight against cancer are just people like you and me, eager to do their best work possible for the best interests of mankind. But they are doing their best work possible within a medical community/ system that is decidedly biased against natural medicine/vitamin therapy in favor of surgery, chemo, and radiation therapy. Many docs that I know don’t know squat about proper nutrition.
Surgery is the least harmful of the docs’ favorites. Highest rate of success as well. Radiology and Chemo are both very toxic, leave the patient susceptible to infection, and on average, patients do not live any longer than untreated patients.
And there are all the drugs, drugs, and more drugs. Ask your doc about them. He probably can give you some free samples donated by his friend the pharmaceutical rep.
And be prepared to be called paranoid by anyone who doesn’t think for themselves. You are questioning the status quo. I think they have a pill for that.
In a word, no.
Finding a "cure" (and it’s unlikely there would just be one treatment that worked on all cancers) would be tremendously prestigious and profitable for a drug company. They have every incentive to come up with better treatments. The problem is that cancer is really many diseases, affecting every type of cell in the human body, yet, the cells are still human cells. It’s very difficult to come up with a drug that kills only the cancer cells and doesn’t kill normal ones.
Immunotherapy and gene therapy offers promise, and these are being investigated as well as more conventional drug treatments.
One in three people get cancer in their lifetime. Treating cancer (and curing it) is a tremendous source of revenue for drug companies. Much more money is spent on treatment than on research.
BTW, B17 is also called Laetrile. It has been extensively studied, and found to be little better than no treatment at all.
DK
Yes. I have had two best friends who cured themselves of cancer naturally without chemotherapy or radiation. One had a month to live as the cancer had spread to her lymph nodes, but that was a year and a half ago and she’s healthier than ever. I’ve also ridden myself before of ailments using a mind-body treatment.
From what I understand, the powers-that-be want to reduce the number of humans to 250 million. So why bother finding a cure?
Also, quite some time ago I learned that there already exists a cure for the big C. Garlic: one clove a day – blended and added to water, or yogurt or anything – will have a 60% chance of curing the big C completely. If one doesn’t do the trick, then I suspect that two will. This is something that I’m going to try if I get the chance. Just think of it, the world biggest killer cured completely by a home grown garden herb. Wouldn’t the pharmaceutical industry love that? Just think how much their profits would be slashed by. No wonder they do everything they can to prevent us people from re-discovering old knowledge.
Society cares nothing for people, society cares for money… and only money.
They are profit driven and not trustworthy. Everyone needs to make a profit to live but I do not believe they are giving their best. They may be giving their best but that is just my opinion.
There are cures – there just aren’t cures that big pharma can patent.
But you are correct – the search is very profitable.
It is also preventable.
I always wonder where the money from all those walk-a-thons and other fundraisers goes. We’re always being hit by those emotional appeals — give money and the cancer will go away. But I’ve noticed we aren’t being told specifically where that money will be going.
From the point of view of the country and the world, I think it would be much more cost effective to use that money to get rid of the toxins that cause cancer in the first place. Clean water, air, soil, and food would to wonders for the public health.
It really does no good at all for someone to come in here and call someone names and ridicule them for holding this position. If you disagree with the poster, then state your reasons why. I am getting tired of people who hold the position that the pharmaceutical industry is beyond reproach. "How dare anybody question their motives, they are saving lives." Give me a break. Why would anybody be suspicious of them? If they were putting profit ahead of peoples well being, it would be the first time in history anybody ever did that. (SARCASM)
Anytime, ANYTIME, an industry stands to profit from holding a certain position, their motives should be subject to question.
Yes and I think we already have cures but we can’t advertise them in this country because anything in this country that cures must be certified by the FDA. Even it is lifestyle and food that cures. But the drug companies control the FDA and do not want you to know. This is how they make profit. Why pay so much for drugs when you can get it through food, which is a lot cheaper.